UPSB v3

Presentation / FL Charge TF Rev

Do or Do Not?

  1. Scandiacus
    Date: Thu, Nov 27 2008 19:35:04

    Please don't move this to the Fundamental Tricks section ph34r.gif

    I've seen many videos and some people like to do the FL Charge TF Rev and then doing FL TA Rev but some skips the Charge Rev (NeoSonic -> FL TA Rev).

    My question is, do you people prefer to have FL Charge TF Rev or not?

  2. nateiskewl
    Date: Thu, Nov 27 2008 20:00:24

    Lol, I've never heard of a Fingerless Charge before.

  3. SJ.
    Date: Thu, Nov 27 2008 20:14:14

    fl charge doesnt exist...

  4. Anemia
    Date: Thu, Nov 27 2008 20:24:43

    I think you mean TF Charge Rev. > FL TA Rev?

  5. AwonW
    Date: Thu, Nov 27 2008 20:26:29

    It depends really. In some cases it can look very appealing while in others it looks out of place so I dunno.

  6. Eric
    Date: Thu, Nov 27 2008 20:28:12

    FL Charge exists because you don't use your fingers, you use your hand. I prefer to skip the TF Charge Rev because when I use it between Neosonic 12-T1 and FL TA Rev, it makes it look like I can't do an FL TA Rev without some extra momentum. IMO, Neosonic 12-T1 > FL TA Rev is pro-er without a TF Charge Rev inbetween.


    That's my opinion.

  7. Ogarathe
    Date: Fri, Nov 28 2008 00:09:41

    QUOTE (AwonW @ Nov 28 2008, 07:26 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    It depends really. In some cases it can look very appealing while in others it looks out of place so I dunno.


    I agree with this.

  8. MikeKe
    Date: Fri, Nov 28 2008 00:16:53

    QUOTE (Eric @ Nov 27 2008, 03:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    FL Charge exists because you don't use your fingers, you use your hand. I prefer to skip the TF Charge Rev because when I use it between Neosonic 12-T1 and FL TA Rev, it makes it look like I can't do an FL TA Rev without some extra momentum. IMO, Neosonic 12-T1 > FL TA Rev is pro-er without a TF Charge Rev inbetween.


    That's my opinion.


    I agree with Eric, ahah.
    (I can't even do TF Charge Rev properly xD, so I just go straight from Neosonic>FL TA Rev)

  9. BL4CKCR4Y0NS
    Date: Fri, Nov 28 2008 05:52:06

    .... is TF Charge Rev going counter-clockwise or clockwise...?

  10. Outsmash
    Date: Fri, Nov 28 2008 06:01:16

    QUOTE (BL4CKCR4Y0NS @ Nov 28 2008, 11:22 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    .... is TF Charge Rev going counter-clockwise or clockwise...?


    Clockwise.. And I'd prefer using FL TF Charge Rev.

  11. Scandiacus
    Date: Fri, Nov 28 2008 09:34:42

    Soooooooooo it's just based on personal preference? ph34r.gif

  12. Jiinn
    Date: Fri, Nov 28 2008 17:02:35

    Mine is not preference because I can't do it w/o the charge dry.gif

  13. OFFbI4
    Date: Fri, Nov 28 2008 21:46:05

    I'd prefer to use it, coz it's more easier to do palm spin after charge tf > fl ta rev than without charge ^^

  14. xxdefinitionxx
    Date: Fri, Nov 28 2008 23:20:56

    Well actually,
    NeoSonic 12-T1/TF>TF Charge Rev> FL TA Rev is more Korean style-ish
    but,
    NeoSonic 12-T1>FL TA Rev has more of a japanese style look...

    so I guess it depends on hwo you want your combo to look...
    it's really not a matter of.."Should I do this or not?"
    It's what you want.

  15. Scandiacus
    Date: Sat, Nov 29 2008 13:30:22

    QUOTE (xxdefinitionxx @ Nov 29 2008, 07:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Well actually,
    NeoSonic 12-T1/TF>FL Charge Rev> FL TA Rev is more Korean style-ish
    but,
    NeoSonic 12-T1>FL TA Rev has more of a japanese style look...

    so I guess it depends on hwo you want your combo to look...
    it's really not a matter of.."Should I do this or not?"
    It's what you want.

    I didn't know PSing could be classified into Korean/Japanese style blink.gif

    But in some cases, FL Charge TF Rev is needed to initiate a certain trick? Like what OFFbI4 stated and Jiinn.

  16. Santa
    Date: Sat, Nov 29 2008 16:10:58

    QUOTE (xxdefinitionxx @ Nov 28 2008, 05:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Well actually,
    NeoSonic 12-T1/TF>FL Charge Rev> FL TA Rev is more Korean style-ish
    but,
    NeoSonic 12-T1>FL TA Rev has more of a japanese style look...

    so I guess it depends on hwo you want your combo to look...
    it's really not a matter of.."Should I do this or not?"
    It's what you want.


    u mean TF charge rev?

    yeah i agree with what ur saying..

  17. Shadowserpant
    Date: Sat, Nov 29 2008 23:03:11

    i dont like it

  18. sangara
    Date: Sun, Nov 30 2008 00:40:52

    Wait a minute, what is this talk about fingerless charge?

  19. Eric
    Date: Sun, Nov 30 2008 03:43:51

    QUOTE (sangara @ Nov 29 2008, 04:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Wait a minute, what is this talk about fingerless charge?


    Basically, we are discussing the use of TF Charge Rev between NeoSonic 12-TF > FL TA Rev.

    NeoSonic 12-TF > FL TA Rev
    or
    NeoSonic 12-TF > Charge Rev TF > FL TA Rev

  20. xxdefinitionxx
    Date: Sun, Nov 30 2008 11:20:40

    QUOTE (Santa @ Nov 29 2008, 08:10 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    u mean TF charge rev?

    yeah i agree with what ur saying..


    oops sorry...Yeah that's what I meant.
    I guess my thoughts were in a knot while I was typing >.<

  21. Scandiacus
    Date: Sun, Nov 30 2008 13:02:56

    QUOTE (Shadowserpant @ Nov 30 2008, 07:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    i dont like it


    As in the visual effect or the feeling of the trick itself?

  22. sangara
    Date: Sun, Nov 30 2008 20:50:41

    QUOTE (Eric @ Nov 29 2008, 07:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Basically, we are discussing the use of TF Charge Rev between NeoSonic 12-TF > FL TA Rev.

    NeoSonic 12-TF > FL TA Rev
    or
    NeoSonic 12-TF > Charge Rev TF > FL TA Rev


    I know what trick you are talking about, I just want to know what a fingerless charge is.

  23. Shadowserpant
    Date: Mon, Dec 1 2008 02:20:43

    dont like seeing it, dont like doing it
    idk
    w/e

  24. GSkyrunner
    Date: Fri, Dec 5 2008 06:51:01

    I like to do hand-shaking TF charge thing like some JEB spinners do lol

    sometimes I don't do TF charge too ( incase , if I want my combo to be smooth )