UPSB v3
Naming Committee / "Tossed" ThumbAround
-
Date: Tue, Mar 17 2009 15:24:17
Is the term "Tossed" removed already? If not, it should be removed.
It's minor and not used frequently but it should still be removed. Basically Changing it from "Tossed TA 34-TF" to "TA 34-TF" since a normal ThumbAround used the thumb. This way, if a "T" is not placed in the starting slot of the ThumbAround (in a breakdown), it's a Tossed TA. -
Date: Tue, Mar 17 2009 18:47:29QUOTE (Outsmash @ Mar 17 2009, 03:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Is the term "Tossed" removed already? If not, it should be removed.
It's minor and not used frequently but it should still be removed. Basically Changing it from "Tossed TA 34-TF" to "TA 34-TF" since a normal ThumbAround used the thumb. This way, if a "T" is not placed in the starting slot of the ThumbAround (in a breakdown), it's a Tossed TA.
I don't quite get you... Would that not mean that TA 23-23 would be tossed? Also, 34-34 and 34-12? You can also do a TA to the TF from any slot on the hand without tossing it... -
Date: Tue, Mar 17 2009 23:20:11
are you referring to this?
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?yobymrmgogg
disregard the double -
Date: Wed, Mar 18 2009 01:09:59
Don't you think that we will need another way to do this. Because new people will be confused when they see the first trick (in most cases) that they learned done with out a T. Adding the tossed part before at least lets them know that they should ask what it is or look it up on youtube. Because I can predict seeing new threads on "TA 12-34" in the trick section all the time.
-
Date: Wed, Mar 18 2009 01:16:30
if its what a posted, im fairly certain we can name it with normal around names
-
Date: Wed, Mar 18 2009 02:12:12
It is what you posted. So the new goal is to name it with already existing names now?
-
Date: Wed, Mar 18 2009 02:15:53
yup
something like middle index backarounds, but with normal around
because it goes around both the middle and thumb for the first part
and comes back around only the thumb -
Date: Mon, Apr 27 2009 14:00:24
You mean something like MiddleThumbaround 23-TF? Sounds good for me.
In MiddleIndexbackaround 1.5 there's like 0.75 of Middlebak and 0.75 of Indexbak.
That "MiddleThumbaround" is like 0.25 MA and 0.75 TA. -
Date: Wed, Apr 29 2009 06:01:57QUOTE (Freeman @ Apr 27 2009, 08:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>You mean something like MiddleThumbaround 23-TF? Sounds good for me.
In MiddleIndexbackaround 1.5 there's like 0.75 of Middlebak and 0.75 of Indexbak.
That "MiddleThumbaround" is like 0.25 MA and 0.75 TA.
I would say it's different. MIBA 1.5 involves a top spin over both the fingers (seperate fingers not noticed) and the Tossed TA or the MTA is an around.
And yes, we should probably change it. It would make it more sensible and not just another 'not-so-used' name..
EDIT:
This is not possibly going to happen but even Neo-Sonic should be renamed to just "IndexAround Reverse 12-TF" but I'll probably go back on this, It's really commonly used and stuff.. -
Date: Wed, Jun 3 2009 18:09:00QUOTEI would say it's different. MIBA 1.5 involves a top spin over both the fingers (seperate fingers not noticed) and the Tossed TA or the MTA is an around
Sorry, I was referring to MIBA 1.5 12-12; not 23-23.
The MIBA 1.5 12-12 is composed of arounds, and the MIBA 1.5 23-23 involves a top spin as you said.
So same thing for the "MTA" -
Date: Wed, Jun 3 2009 23:51:21
i think we need to sort out discrepancies in arounds and spins
-
Date: Thu, Jun 4 2009 01:47:14QUOTE (Shadowserpant @ Jun 3 2009, 03:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>i think we need to sort out discrepancies in arounds and spins
I second that notion. It's not a backaround but a backspin. Hell, it's not even a backaround.
-
Date: Fri, Oct 16 2009 17:11:07
Recovery:
As I said , I reconsidered my thoughts and I think TA 23-TF, etc, could work, like the IA 1.0 23-12