UPSB v3
Spammer's Bin / Twilight
-
Date: Sun, May 31 2009 03:00:07
so.... I finally got a hold of the book "Twilight" since its suppose to be so good... by the first 20 pages i wanted to just return the book back to the library. buuuut its suppose to be good so i forced myself to keep reading it. got to page 200. and now i give up... I have no idea why people would actually think that book is so good. its so horrible
-
Date: Sun, May 31 2009 03:01:29
-
Date: Sun, May 31 2009 03:13:20
The people who think it is "good" are 15 year old girls.
-
Date: Sun, May 31 2009 03:48:34
i actually got recommned to read this book by a grade 11 (or is she grade 12?)
-
Date: Sun, May 31 2009 04:05:57
I totally agree
Not really as good as it should be. I read the first book, and it was full of the crappiest writing ever.
Way too many adverbs, horrible plot/resolution, and way too much sex/mushy stuff in it to be enjoyable.
Also, the book is like 90 percent passive voice, which is hella boring to read >.< -
Date: Sun, May 31 2009 17:45:51
I know a few girls who started reading this book.... I'm scared
-
Date: Sun, May 31 2009 17:51:43
Dude its a chick book, you even said it yourself that a girl recommended to you.
-
Date: Sun, May 31 2009 18:12:10
i know some guys who read the book and found it good tho >_> anyways, i really hate it how the guy (edward?) always seems to just pop out of nowhere whenever the girl is in trouble
-
Date: Sun, May 31 2009 18:16:08
It's a fad. It'll pass.
-
Date: Sun, May 31 2009 18:46:04
I don't read.
-
Date: Sun, May 31 2009 19:02:09
its not like everyone has to like it
-
Date: Sun, May 31 2009 20:30:07QUOTE (SJ @ May 31 2009, 09:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>its not like everyone has to like it
"What? you mean you say the book sucks right? huh?! hater!!!1 I bet you're just jealous of edward!! because he's so much sexier and smarter than you are!!!11!1 MURDERRRRRRRRRRRRRR"
-
Date: Mon, Jun 1 2009 04:40:54QUOTE (Resonance @ May 31 2009, 01:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>"What? you mean you say the book sucks right? huh?! hater!!!1 I bet you're just jealous of edward!! because he's so much sexier and smarter than you are!!!11!1 MURDERRRRRRRRRRRRRR"
is that a quote from a forum? lmao
anyway, i saw the movie (sorta had to) and it sucked...
bad acting and strange plot
Edward Cullen cant talk for shit. -
Date: Mon, Jun 1 2009 11:16:17
OMG HOW DARE YOU SAY ANYTHING BAD ABOUT TWILIGHT!!!!!??? TAKE IT BACK IMMEDIATELY!!!!
-
Date: Mon, Jun 1 2009 13:31:39
-
Date: Mon, Jun 1 2009 14:18:01QUOTE (Erirornal Kraione @ Jun 1 2009, 03:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
haha i lol'd so much when i read that -
Date: Tue, Jun 2 2009 00:46:58QUOTE (SJ @ May 31 2009, 09:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>anyway, i saw the movie (sorta had to) and it sucked...
bad acting and strange plot
Edward Cullen cant talk for shit.
Yeah I watched the movie because anything with a love story appeals to me....and apparently since over a million people LUUUURVE Twilight it should be good right?
Seriously without being biased I can say that there is absolutely no love story.
Edward and Bella obivously have no idea what real love is.
Nothing in the story shows why she should love him or why he should love her.
It's more of a lust story.
Edward is "hot" and that's why Bella is with him.(Definitely not by my standards though, and you guys know how gay I am)
and I can't stand a love story with ugly people...BELLA IS TOO FUCKING UGLY. -
Date: Tue, Jun 2 2009 03:11:28
ashely greene shouldve been in the movie with long hair -
Date: Tue, Jun 2 2009 05:04:31QUOTE (Erirornal Kraione @ Jun 1 2009, 04:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That was like the first semi funny comic to come out of XKCD for months. -
Date: Tue, Jun 2 2009 13:09:57QUOTE (Teatime @ Jun 2 2009, 07:04 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>That was like the first semi funny comic to come out of XKCD for months.
android sleep was pretty funny ^^
and Together
and New Car "flashing and everything"
Crime Scene was also funny
and of course: Unsataisfied, so sad and funny -
Date: Wed, Nov 18 2009 23:34:21
Meh, read the series for the hell of it.
Okay book, nothing special. -
Date: Thu, Nov 19 2009 02:25:58QUOTE (000zero0000 @ May 31 2009, 11:12 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>i know some guys who read the book and found it good tho >_> anyways, i really hate it how the guy (edward?) always seems to just pop out of nowhere whenever the girl is in trouble
read the book, if you like it, your gay or have a pussy
Or both -
Date: Thu, Nov 19 2009 03:45:23
Stephen King: "The real difference is that Jo ( ) Rowling is a terrific writer and Stephanie Meyer can't write worth a darn. She's not very good."
If even the great Stephen Hawking says so...
But really, its like all those chick lit books out there with their stupid teen lingo and superficial love, blah blah blah. It disgusts me. Really not worth the hype. You don't see Meg Cabot's books going to all this crap. They're both essentially designed to fleece money from the teenage girl demographic.
Go Jo! -
Date: Thu, Nov 19 2009 15:53:53QUOTE (Aries @ May 31 2009, 10:46 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I don't read.
-
Date: Thu, Nov 19 2009 16:33:20
Why do people parade their inability to read as a proud standard? Is illiteracy not a fallicy? Is it deemed unfashionable to have the desire to attain knowledge and illumination or is it simply the product of modern culture to berate the medium that proves to be the stimulator of imagination, of fantasy and of the magic that is poetry? That which is not found in modern abberants like 'MTV' and 'E!'?
Culture is something to be cultivated, not spurned. -
Date: Thu, Nov 19 2009 21:50:36QUOTE (Jaybles @ Nov 19 2009, 04:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Stephen King: "The real difference is that Jo ( ) Rowling is a terrific writer and Stephanie Meyer can't write worth a darn. She's not very good."QUOTE (Jaybles @ Nov 19 2009, 04:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Stephen King: "The real difference is that Jo ( ) Rowling is a terrific writer and Stephanie Meyer can't write worth a darn. She's not very good."QUOTE (Jaybles @ Nov 19 2009, 04:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Stephen King: "The real difference is that Jo ( ) Rowling is a terrific writer."QUOTE (Jaybles @ Nov 19 2009, 04:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>terrific writerQUOTE (Jaybles @ Nov 19 2009, 04:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>terrible writer
Fix't. -
Date: Fri, Nov 20 2009 02:54:50
Jo is better than Meyers though.
-
Date: Fri, Nov 20 2009 04:49:20
alright... so i had a vague knowledge of what twilight was vaguely about when the first movie came out
i saw the trailer for the 2nd movie, all i got was that the vampire was fighting a werewolf, i'm not sure where the plot comes in here
friend informed me of "twilight in 30 seconds with bunnies" and that made it more confusing
wikipedia synopsis was still confusing
beef-rant time!
ok, so why the eff are vampires "attractive"
i mean, they suck blood, unless you're a goth chick, i dont think you'll like the whole gore thing
even animal blood (yes, i managed to figure out that part of twilight) is weird
vampires are meant to be scary, not attractive
just like toothed vagina isn't scary, its hilariously funny
vampires make horror stories, vaginas make comedy.... is what my main point ended up to be... quite weird... shoulda thought it through more thoroughly
point is, i dont know why vampire-romance is such a huge thing
maybe its like one of those "it'll definitely never happen, but its damn hot to think about" things
like every guy's fantasy of hooking up with twin sisters- they're never gonna agree to it, but its sure hot
/end beef-rant
actually, maybe i should troll the twilight boards
and use the alias zuolin
or just "promise" zuolin a upsb rsvp if he can troll the twilight boards as long as he can without getting banned -
Date: Fri, Nov 20 2009 06:59:38QUOTE (Jaybles @ Nov 19 2009, 11:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Why do people parade their inability to read as a proud standard? Is illiteracy not a fallicy? Is it deemed unfashionable to have the desire to attain knowledge and illumination or is it simply the product of modern culture to berate the medium that proves to be the stimulator of imagination, of fantasy and of the magic that is poetry? That which is not found in modern abberants like 'MTV' and 'E!'?
Culture is something to be cultivated, not spurned.
he said i don't read not i can't read. -
Date: Fri, Nov 20 2009 12:18:09QUOTE (Zombo @ Nov 20 2009, 02:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>he said i don't read not i can't read.
It might as well be the same, considering the crap people do read. -
Date: Fri, Nov 20 2009 14:31:57
hehehe just seeing the word twilight gives me the impression of "gay" and "suckish"
-
Date: Fri, Nov 20 2009 14:52:21QUOTE (Jaybles @ Nov 20 2009, 07:18 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>It might as well be the same, considering the crap people do read.
no.
I don't read clearly means "reading is not my hobby" -
Date: Fri, Nov 20 2009 16:03:03QUOTE (Zombo @ Nov 20 2009, 10:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>no.
I don't read clearly means "reading is not my hobby"
But surely, the sentiments that are carried with it is that reading is lent a negative connotation?
Anyway, all right. You win Zombo.