UPSB v3

Off-topic / Earth hour!

  1. Prince
    Date: Sat, Mar 27 2010 20:27:17

    Okay in 5 minutes the whole world is encouraged to switch off all electricity for one hour!

    http://www.earthhour.org/

    join me! o:

    20:30 gmt+0

  2. neXus
    Date: Sat, Mar 27 2010 21:11:09

    No one will do this.

    Seriously.

  3. SJ
    Date: Sat, Mar 27 2010 21:44:21

    QUOTE (neXus @ Mar 27 2010, 02:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    No one will do this.

    Seriously.

    http://green.yahoo.com/blog/greenpicks/274...earth-hour.html

  4. neXus
    Date: Sat, Mar 27 2010 21:53:52

    QUOTE
    The goal of the World Wildlife Fund-sponsored event isn't to save energy on this one day -- it's to raise awareness of climate change and energy conservation all year round.


    So how does that work. How does a bunch of people turning their lights off for 1 tiny hour raise my awareness for climate change and energy conservation. It has literally no effect on me and very very little effect on anything.

    The list of things I could do to "improve this planet" is just hilarious. Like laugh out loud hilarious.

  5. Mats
    Date: Sat, Mar 27 2010 22:51:34

    Two things:

    It will only make a difference if people do this consistantly, or at least, conserve power consistantly.

    Secondly, it would seem the logical step (from a man who has studied quite far into physics) would be to use nuclear fission power for the next generation of mankind (bearing in mind that the 3 mile island/Chernobyl plants were old designs). Using the new design of nuclear reacter which has never failed. Switching to fusion (which will have it's energy source as lithuim producing water as a bi-product) in the generation following (assuming enough funding goes into this). As far as I know, only the UK, US and France are really funding fusion. It's the best option. Wind/Solar/Wave etc are useless as fuck (bear in mind I have quite a bit of idea of what I'm talking about here). Most projections on so called 'renewables' are really exageratted and best case scenarios. Fission you are getting a few percent of mass to energy and fission you get about 10% mass to energy converversion (very useful). Renewables is like 1% or less so you need at least 10x more renewable source plants to one of fusion...

  6. Prince
    Date: Sat, Mar 27 2010 23:05:34

    I sat there drawinmng for the whole thing (: and i was having so much fun i didnt notice the time untill like 10:15 (approx 45 mins extra o: )
    If you did it too then im glad to hear, it was actually pretty fun for me

  7. SJ
    Date: Sat, Mar 27 2010 23:26:16

    QUOTE (neXus @ Mar 27 2010, 02:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    So how does that work. How does a bunch of people turning their lights off for 1 tiny hour raise my awareness for climate change and energy conservation. It has literally no effect on me and very very little effect on anything.

    The list of things I could do to "improve this planet" is just hilarious. Like laugh out loud hilarious.

    QUOTE (Mats @ Mar 27 2010, 03:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Two things:

    It will only make a difference if people do this consistantly, or at least, conserve power consistantly.

    Secondly, it would seem the logical step (from a man who has studied quite far into physics) would be to use nuclear fission power for the next generation of mankind (bearing in mind that the 3 mile island/Chernobyl plants were old designs). Using the new design of nuclear reacter which has never failed. Switching to fusion (which will have it's energy source as lithuim producing water as a bi-product) in the generation following (assuming enough funding goes into this). As far as I know, only the UK, US and France are really funding fusion. It's the best option. Wind/Solar/Wave etc are useless as fuck (bear in mind I have quite a bit of idea of what I'm talking about here). Most projections on so called 'renewables' are really exageratted and best case scenarios. Fission you are getting a few percent of mass to energy and fission you get about 10% mass to energy converversion (very useful). Renewables is like 1% or less so you need at least 10x more renewable source plants to one of fusion...


    lol wow people
    chill out
    just take a moment and observe the nature
    dont over analyze everything
    just turn the lights off for an hour
    that will make some difference
    its gotta start somewhere right?

  8. Zombo
    Date: Sun, Mar 28 2010 00:22:33

    you cant do something like this globally, it has to be dependent to timezone

    nobody is gnna do this in the middle in the night for instance