UPSB v3
Advanced Tricks / Extended rev TA
NOT Extended TA rev
-
Date: Mon, Mar 10 2008 17:00:58
is there sth like this? or I just made up a new trick
-
Date: Mon, Mar 10 2008 17:17:39
You just made up a "new" combination of names/modifiers. Exactly how would a hybrid like this work? And most often, simple hybrids are not seen as new inventions since most linkages or similar ones already have been done by someone before.
A reverse version of the extended modifier doesn't make sense to me for a TA. Would be TA -> BackAround 12-T1 -
Date: Mon, Mar 10 2008 20:41:30
explanation? video?
it's probably a common hybrid, its just we don't name them anymore. -
Date: Mon, Mar 10 2008 21:15:15
show a video pl0x
-
Date: Tue, Mar 11 2008 14:53:09
okey here's the vid
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=UcDZK8vPD20 - i'm not very good at it thoug, i didn't complete the revolution in that vid. But you can clearly see what i was doing -
Date: Tue, Mar 11 2008 15:29:43
TA rev ~ shadow rev T1-12
...i think -
Date: Tue, Mar 11 2008 15:33:17
You could also call that TA rev ~> Shadow rev 1.0 t1-12...
Edit... hmm a little late.. -
Date: Tue, Mar 11 2008 15:48:27
I did that days ago: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAt_Cfhr-sY
But it's the same as Susho's... >.<
I think, it's the only possibility... -
Date: Tue, Mar 11 2008 16:15:39QUOTE (Zoda @ Mar 11 2008, 04:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I did that days ago: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAt_Cfhr-sY
But it's the same as Susho's... >.<
I think, it's the only possibility...
but you also named it extended rev ta so I think it should be named that way :} -
Date: Tue, Mar 11 2008 16:55:49
No, because we should not be naming hybrids aside from the parts they consist of. It only causes more confusion.
Nice find, but not really new. Just rare. -
Date: Tue, Mar 11 2008 17:17:30
Why not:
TA Rev 12-12 ~> IA Rev .5 12-T1? -
Date: Tue, Mar 11 2008 17:54:36
Because it does a spin on the indexfinger...
and you wouldnt call it IA Rev .5 12-T1, the move in a ext ta, but a fingerless pass...