UPSB v3
Battlezone / Dynamik vs. nateiskewl
battle
-
Date: Mon, Jun 16 2008 19:09:23
Dynamik
nateiskewl -
Date: Mon, Jun 16 2008 19:15:48
+1 nate for difficulty and smoothness, although i did find that your clip was a little too short, but dynamik's wasn't that much longer so that wasn't really too big of a factor
-
Date: Mon, Jun 16 2008 19:29:55
nulled
very even imo
btw dynamik what pen is that? -
Date: Mon, Jun 16 2008 19:32:17
nulled i thought both of you did well
only thing i would like a little better is dynamik's camera angle. i would really like a side angle more rather than a straight angle at you -
Date: Mon, Jun 16 2008 19:34:19QUOTE (tomohiro @ Jun 16 2008, 03:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>nulled i thought both of you did well
only thing i would like a little better is dynamik's camera angle. i would really like a side angle more rather than a straight angle at you
oh yeah, forgot to mention that in my post before about how dynamik's angle kinda annoyed me when i was watching it
-
Date: Mon, Jun 16 2008 19:37:11QUOTE (mhig @ Jun 16 2008, 03:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>nulled very even imo
btw dynamik what pen is that?
personal tombow mod -
Date: Mon, Jun 16 2008 19:46:06
very hard decision, but i decided for nateiskewl
+1 nateiskewl -
Date: Mon, Jun 16 2008 20:14:57
Nate was more smooth and had a better hand position.
+1 for nate -
Date: Mon, Jun 16 2008 20:53:15
+1 Nate.
Smooth + Appealing. -
Date: Mon, Jun 16 2008 20:57:09
Damn good battle. I nulled.
-
Date: Tue, Jun 17 2008 02:41:46
Dynamik. Totally.
I loved the technical difficulty of dynamik's combo, the smoothness was negligeably in advantage of nate, but we can consider the fact that he spins with a Dr.KT.
Not enough creativity for nate, repetitions are bad, too.
Message to both spinners: be proud of what you do, okay? show us that you love your combo, that you worked hard, gimme reasons to love your spin. Put passion in your spin. Both combo was boring. No surprises. Dynamik made cool tricks, but beacause he don't put passion I need 3 watchings to realise that this is creative.
Seriously, put passion in your spin. -
Date: Tue, Jun 17 2008 02:48:34QUOTE (Stay'n Alive @ Jun 16 2008, 07:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Not enough creativity for nate, repetitions are bad, too.
Did I do something more than once?
-
Date: Tue, Jun 17 2008 02:50:54QUOTE (Stay'n Alive @ Jun 16 2008, 07:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Dynamik. Totally.
I loved the technical difficulty of dynamik's combo, the smoothness was negligeably in advantage of nate, but we can consider the fact that he spins with a Dr.KT.
Not enough creativity for nate, repetitions are bad, too.
Message to both spinners: be proud of what you do, okay? show us that you love your combo, that you worked hard, gimme reasons to love your spin. Put passion in your spin. Both combo was boring. No surprises. Dynamik made cool tricks, but beacause he don't put passion I need 3 watchings to realise that this is creative.
Seriously, put passion in your spin.
...I saw the passion.
-
Date: Tue, Jun 17 2008 02:52:19QUOTE (Stay'n Alive @ Jun 16 2008, 07:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Dynamik. Totally.
I loved the technical difficulty of dynamik's combo, the smoothness was negligeably in advantage of nate, but we can consider the fact that he spins with a Dr.KT.
Not enough creativity for nate, repetitions are bad, too.
Message to both spinners: be proud of what you do, okay? show us that you love your combo, that you worked hard, gimme reasons to love your spin. Put passion in your spin. Both combo was boring. No surprises. Dynamik made cool tricks, but beacause he don't put passion I need 3 watchings to realise that this is creative.
Seriously, put passion in your spin.
I thought nate was using a comssa. I guess I don't know my mods very well.
Tough descision. Both were good combos and nothing stood out. Null!
-
Date: Tue, Jun 17 2008 05:06:40QUOTE (Stay'n Alive @ Jun 16 2008, 10:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Message to both spinners: be proud of what you do, okay? show us that you love your combo, that you worked hard, gimme reasons to love your spin. Put passion in your spin. Both combo was boring. No surprises. Dynamik made cool tricks, but beacause he don't put passion I need 3 watchings to realise that this is creative.
Seriously, put passion in your spin.
it was after a couple hours of filming. i guess i wasn't as passionate as when i first started to film.QUOTE (nateiskewl @ Jun 16 2008, 10:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Did I do something more than once?
u did a tw sonic bust twice
-
Date: Tue, Jun 17 2008 05:10:09
+1 fer nate....
you have a style similar to lost's
-
Date: Tue, Jun 17 2008 05:25:51
Dynamik:
XD 
Oh, it's a comssa guys. -
Date: Tue, Jun 17 2008 05:43:30QUOTE (nateiskewl @ Jun 16 2008, 07:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Did I do something more than once?
well he can mean like u used alot of the same things in your recent battles...
i noticed u used your mini combo neo sonic-> thumbflap charge reverse-> fingerless thumbaround reverse T-T1-> korean bak-> fingerlass ta-> pass 12-> twisted sonic 12-23 combo like in all your battle
well never been good at breaking down combo so xD.. o and also u've ended with a bust bak rev or extended thumbaround-> bak rev
just more variety in your ending that's all
-
Date: Tue, Jun 17 2008 07:48:01
+1 nate
-
Date: Tue, Jun 17 2008 18:57:44
Okay, yeah, my comment about repetitions was false. Sorry.
-
Date: Tue, Jun 17 2008 20:02:04
Its hard to believe that Nate can get his pen to run that smooth. Man, you're like butter you know that? Vote went to Nate.
Dynamik didnt do bad either; your angle could be a little better, buhh overall you did well. I jus had to give nate the overhand on this one. Good spinning to the both of you. -
Date: Wed, Jun 18 2008 03:54:53
+1 Nate
Difficulty and smoothness won it. You put up a good fight though Dynamik. Guess we'll see who wins in the end. -
Date: Fri, Jun 20 2008 19:25:37
I engaged in the breakdown team, I wanna train, heres the break of nate's combo, tell me if there are errors.
devil's sonic 23-12: inverse twisted sonic rev. 12-23: double charge 23 rev.: twisted sonic to palmspin: sonic 43-23: twised sonic burst: pass 12-23:
passaround 23-12: double charge 12: neosonic 12-t1 to thumbflap charge to fl. TA rev.: backaround 1,5: pass 12-23: twisted sonic 23-12:
fake double: pass rev. 12-23: twisted sonic double burst. -
Date: Fri, Jun 20 2008 20:00:53
You should use -> instead of :, and use ~ for hybrids
also use around 0.5 instead of passaround -
Date: Fri, Jun 20 2008 20:27:15
Also it should be twisted sonic -> palmspin and twisted sonic double bust at the end.
-
Date: Fri, Jun 20 2008 21:52:49
omggggggggg
nate i love your combos and your style!!!
sry dynamik
but
+1 nate! -
Date: Fri, Jun 20 2008 22:04:47
+1 Nate for smoothness and angle.
Dynamik, you spammed a mini combo that I noticed, so yeah... and work on that angle, please. -
Date: Sat, Jun 21 2008 01:16:56
+1 nate
lol stay'n alive...you made a kinda uneducated comment
most of it was answered but...you do realize that he was spinning a metallic comssa right o.O
iLulz... -
Date: Thu, Jun 26 2008 09:04:40
IMO nateiskewl set better camera angle... vote for you, nateiskewl
-
Date: Thu, Jun 26 2008 14:41:43
poll closed. nate wins
-
Date: Fri, Jun 27 2008 14:05:23
what is that move you do before a FL TA? sorry but im kinda lousy.. still learning xD
-
Date: Fri, Jun 27 2008 14:08:44
If you're referring to before the FL TA Reverse, people usually do Neosonic 12-T1 -> Charge Reverse T1 -> FL TA Reverse
-
Date: Fri, Jun 27 2008 16:57:14QUOTE (BlackOut @ Jun 27 2008, 10:05 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>what is that move you do before a FL TA? sorry but im kinda lousy.. still learning xD
if u are talking about the fl ta at the end of my combo, heres the breakdown: rev double charge 23-23 -> tw sonic 23-12 -> TA ~> FL TA